image

Policy & Legal Initiatives

Strengthening Navajo Voices

This section highlights the Commission’s key advocacy work — protecting sacred lands, ensuring fair representation, addressing discrimination, and building stronger partnerships with neighboring communities. Each initiative reflects our commitment to justice, dignity, and the well-being of the Navajo people.

Browse published reports from public hearings and investigations.

Reports & PublicationsReports & Publications

2025 Report: Public Hearing Report on the Gallup McKinley County School District

On behalf of the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission, It is my pleasure to submit to you the attached report... Read More...

2022 Report: Preliminary Assessment on the Treatment of Navajo and Native American Students in Schools On and Off the Navajo Nation

The report is a compilation of thirteen public hearings held around the Navajo Nation. Read More...

2020 Report: Mortuary Services and Funeral Planning Report: Advocating for the return of Navajo Traditional Burial

The report is a compilation of four public seminars, research and qualitative discussions with Navajo traditional practitioners, anthropologist experts, Navajo historical scholars and local law enforcement personnel. Read More...

2015 Public Hearing Report: The Status of Navajo Women and Gender Violence

The Report is a compilation of three (3) public hearings held in the Navajo communities of Window Rock, Tuba City, Navajo Nation (AZ) and Shiprock, Navajo Nation (NM). Read More...

2014 Public Hearing Report: Assessing Abuse of Navajo Customers when Purchasing Vehicles in Border Towns

The Report is a compilation of three (3) public hearings held in the Navajo communities of Dilkon, Kayenta, Navajo Nation (AZ) and Crownpoint, Navajo Nation (NM). Read More...

2012 Public Hearing Report: Sacred Sites: The Preservation, Protection and use of Sacred Sites

The Report is a compilation of five (5) public hearings held in the Navajo communities of Crownpoint, Navajo Nation (NM), Fort Defiance, Chinle, Tuba City , Navajo Nation (AZ), Shiprock, Navajo Nation (NM). Read More...

2012 Public Hearing Report: The Impact of the Navajo Hopi Land Settlement Act of 1974 - P.L. 93-531 et al

Diné bi naat’á must take a lead role in addressing the multiplicity of the issues raised by the individuals who presented testimony during the course of the multiple public hearings Read More...

2008-2009 Assessing Race Relations Between Navajos and Non-Navajos: A Review of Border Town Race Relations

Diné bi naat’á must take a lead role in addressing the multiplicity of the issues raised by the individuals who presented testimony during the course of ten months of public hearings Read More...

MOAs create shared expectations—fair treatment, rapid response, and coordinated services—so our communities stay safe, respected, and heard.

Memorandum of Agreement

Safeguarding sacred and cultural landmarks vital to Navajo identity and traditions.

"Creating partnerships with border towns is a critical component to end racist attitudes, values and beliefs. This helps to promote education and awareness of racism and it sends a strong message to the general public that racism will not be tolerated. The Commission developed a standard Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to assist the Office with strengthening communication and coordinating services that promotes healthy, positive community relations with all people visiting, residing or doing business in border towns. Ideally, the MOA will assist in setting standards for healthy, positive community relations dealing with cultural diversity, fairness, integrity and respect to all peoples. It is through these types of agreements the Commission determines as the most effective and acceptable manner for addressing race relations.

Typically, after a MOU has been signed with the City, NNHRC works with established community group(s) if one exists. NNHRC works to gain their local perspective and their no cost recommendations to improve race relations; NNHRC also stresses a set timeline in receiving a group(s) recommendation."

Source: NNHRCs Assessing Race Relations Public Hearing Report

Prior to the Navajo Nation government reform, a non-binding agreement was referenced as a "memorandum of agreement." Since the reform, a non-binding agreement is a "memorandum of understanding." So prior to reform and since reform, the Memorandums with City governments to improve race relations with NNHRC are non-binding.

Memorandum of Agreements/Understanding:

Redistricting

Ensuring fair representation for Navajo citizens in all levels of government through equitable districting plans.

NNHRC is involved in redistricting as it deals with race to protect Navajo peoples’ interest and their ability to elect a candidate of their choice. Navajos are citizens of the United States and it is crucial that Navajo people are fairly and adequately represented in all legislative and Congressional to school districts redistricting plans.

NNHRC presented what’s in the best interest for the Navajo people where Navajo is impacted.

Beginning in March 2011, NNHRC actively pursued redistricting activities in a timely manner at the release of the new U.S. Census data. At that time, NNHRC staff members presented to Commissioners on the matter. Patty Ferguson-Bohnee and Judith Dworkin, both attorneys from Sacks Tierney law office, presented an overview of standards for redistricting in congressional and legislative districts and advocated for maintaining the Navajo Nation as a “community of interest” to prevent a diluted district.

Navajo voters have a “community of interest,” a redistricting term, with the border towns surrounding the Navajo Nation due to the fact that Navajo significantly contribute to the border towns’ retail and social economies. In addition, the Navajo Nation explained that Navajo voters also have communities of interest with other indigenous peoples as federal and state laws often equally affect programs providing services and land status policies for indigenous peoples, according to NNHRCNOV-11-11.

Competitiveness, another redistricting term, was not a priority for NNHRC.

On March 31, 2011, the Speaker of the Navajo Nation Council directed the Commission to “head advocacy efforts on behalf of the legislative branch of the Navajo Nation government with regards to redistricting voting districts in the states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah.” Based on this directive, the Commission formulated redistricting maps for Arizona, Utah and New Mexico from the congressional level to the school districts.

NNHRC developed GIS generated maps with TIGER data and recommended maps that retained or enhanced the Native American Voting Age Population, and would comply with the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution.

Each recommended map was approved by NNHRCs oversight committee, the Naabik’iyati’ Committee of the 22nd Navajo Nation Council.

The Commission ensured that all members of the Navajo Nation were fairly and adequately represented in all elective districts. Most particularly, the Commission:

  1. Improved/Maintained the legislative districting in which the Navajo Nation is located and preserve a "majority-minority" standard;
  2. Improved/Maintained the Congressional districts in which the Navajo Nation is located;
  3. Remained intake in a single legislative district(s) to avoid “cracking;”
  4. Resisted all efforts to “dilute” the strength of the Navajo vote to ensure that Navajo voters are given fair and equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice; and
  5. Resisted retrogression to ensure that Navajo voting rights are protected and preserved.

According to a NNHRCMAR-13-12 resolution, NNHRC expended substantial resources to advocate for the voting rights of Navajo people. Also, the Commission staff with the Navajo Nation Department of Justice and outside legal counsel analyzed the redistricting requirements provided by the U.S. Constitution, Arizona Constitution, and Voting Rights Act to ensure that the Navajo Nation redistricting maps met the legal requirements. Furthermore, the Commission staff worked on redistricting activities as well as the Navajo Nation Department of Justice and the Office of the President and Vice President in development of the Navajo Nation’s redistricting plans.

In August 2011, the Navajo Nation Speaker assigned five Navajo Nation Council Delegates to work with the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission on the state redistricting activities, according to NABIAU-47-11, with the responsibility to appear and provide testimony with NNHRC staff members who are also responsible to appear and provide testimony on behalf of the Navajo Nation. The Council Delegates include: Hon. Alton Shepherd, Hon. Lorenzo Bates, Hon. Leonard Tsosie, Hon. Kenneth Maryboy and Hon. Jonathan Nez.

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in the matter of voting rights act has changed the dynamics of the Arizona Redistricting Case. The Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission, in working with Navajo Department of Justice, is assessing the impacts of the U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Source: NNHRCNOV-11-11, NNHRCMAR-13-12, NABIAU-47-11.

Goals and Priorities

  • Review the Nation's redistricting goals and terminology 
  • Explore redistricting priorities from "Redistricting: Impacts on the Navajo People". 

Proposed Maps and Links

To view the proposed maps for redistricting, specifically for Cuba Independent School District, Gallup Mckinley County School District, and Central Consolidated School Districts, Arizona Redistricting (via an indepdent redistricting commission), New Mexico Redistricting (via a legislative redistricting committee), Utah Redistricting (via a legislative redistricting committee), please look at the links below.

Arizona Redistricting
(via an indepdent redistricting commission)
View Map
New Mexico Redistricting
(via a legislative redistricting committee)
View Map
Utah Redistricting
(via a legislative redistricting committee)
View Map

Forced Relocation

"Many Navajo citizens raise concerns regarding impositions and violations of their human rights when they are removed from their original homelands to other locations. In addition to the ongoing concerns and issues pertaining to the Navajo-Hopi land disputes, Navajos also raised concerns regarding the removal in Page, Arizona when the dam was constructed, the meandering river in Bluff, Utah which created hostile relationships between community members, and families removed from their homelands when companies settled on the Navajo Nation such as the mining companies. Navajo directly affected by forced relocation are increasingly interested in implementing the Declaration on the Navajo Nation."

Source: NNHRCs Assessing Race Relations Public Hearing Report

Border Town Discrimination

“Discrimination, while denied by many, difficult to document and poorly protected against by the legal system, has been with mankind since oldest of times. It is an ancient monster that will thrive among mankind as long as it is not collectively acknowledged and eliminated. Two incidents involving the deaths of two Navajo males triggered the Navajo Nation Council to act decisively to address the public outraged that resulted from these senseless and horrible deaths. For that reason in 2006, the Navajo Nation Council (Council), pursuant to 2 N.N.C 920-924 established the Navajo Nation Human Rights Commission (Commission) and directed the Commission to immediately assess border town race relations, educate Navajo citizens on civil and human rights, assist Navajo citizens with discrimination complaints and work with other tribal, federal, state, local and international civil and human rights organizations.
The Commission authorized 25 public hearings that began on December 2, 2011 and ended near the close of the fiscal year on September 3, 2009."

Source: NNHRCs Assessing Race Relations Public Hearing Report

Following the 25 pubic hearings and gathering testimonies, the Commission released their 2008-2009 Assessing Race Relations Between Navajos and Non-Navajos: A Review of Border Town Race Relations on July 18, 2010. In the report, recommendations were provided about improving race relations in border towns.

We protect the places that define us and the markets that serve us. By advancing sacred-site safeguards and a Navajo Better Business Bureau, we promote dignity, accountability, and opportunity for our people.

Sacred Sites

Safeguarding sacred and cultural landmarks vital to Navajo identity and traditions.

"Navajo citizens raised strong concerns regarding the need to protect the Peaks as one of the sacred sites on and near the Navajo Nation. In addition to the sacred mountains, which are located outside the Navajo Nation, the Commission determined it to be important and necessary to assess the Navajo citizens’ desires to protect and preserve sacred sites located on the Navajo Nation. Presently, the Commission is developing its hearing report regarding Navajo sacred sites."

Source: NNHRCs Assessing Race Relations Public Hearing Report

In March 2, 2015 the Navajo Nation filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The petition addresses the violation of the Navajo people’s rights to religion, culture and judicial protection by the use of reclaimed wastewater for snowmaking for a commercial ski operation on the San Francisco Peaks, a site sacred to the Navajo.

Navajo Better Business Bureau

Promoting fair business practices and consumer protection within Navajo communities.

"One of the recommendations made in the NNHRC Assessing Race Relations report has been forwarded to the Navajo Nation Division of Economic Development for the establishment of a Navajo Better Business Bureau, which would play the role of other better business bureau’s but specifically for the Navajos.
The recommended Navajo Better Business Bureau would be authorized to receive consumer complaints and publish an annual businesses directory that certifies off-reservation business as Navajo friendly and list those that should be avoided and why; provide information on Navajo employment, including retention rates; cultural sensitivity training and whether management training is offered to Navajo employees."

Source: NNHRCs Assessing Race Relations Public Hearing Report

NNHRC has begun to research other avenues to address consumer related concerns such as a consumer protection bureau.